Donz2 - Page: 3 of 10

How i carve stone..

I simply extend the photon structure of the said Serpentine thereby altering the phenomenon of light which would otherwise be eliminated within the conventional wave picture or photoelectric effect caused when the rough edge of the cutting disc strikes the stone. In this obvious refraction through photoelectric conundrum the electrons can be attracted towards the positively charged stone thereby establishing a direct if not vibratic instruction to my hands.

The forming can be further enhanced using the Blackbody effect or the Wave-Particle Duality mode (W.P.D), both of which i have found can cause either dramatic sloping effects or a shattering of the inner core leaving nothing but a broken stone fit only for hardcore.

However, by going completely sideways and using the Compton Scattering effect i have achieved the random removal of stone using wavelengths between the incident and the scattered light, this is very hard to achieve using visible light, but by using the moon i can achieve wavelengths of the order of 500 nm(nano-miccroptic [light] ) . However, it is a comparatively large effect for moon rays, where really i should be using wavelengths of the order of 0.1 nm, and so moon rays were used to demonstrate that such scattering does indeed take place, albeit it in a frighteningly fast, erratic and unpredictable action and only should be attempted in the correct protective conditions, adequate safety measures followed and only if the use of diffraction and interference cannot otherwise prove adequate (or, get someone else to do it).

Having said that, the results recorded through W.P.D alone show so obviously on the Serpentine that the good old Compton method has to be attempted just to see the cats fly up the trees.

For the Amulets i tend to stick to the time honored De Broglie Waves motion. This form of Serpentine carving shows that quantitively time cannot alter the actual particle of mass without staring at it for three minutes and 12 seconds.
This length has been measured since time immortal and even given the advanced nature of W.P.D, Blackbody and Compton, the hypothesis tests would involve demonstrating wave properties of matter at the wavelength given by Eq.(27.10) and, as shown in the graph below (fig .1), these over complicate what the De Broglie motion simplifies.

Relatively straightforward tests are offered by diffraction and interference - if a beam of such ``particles'' from the edge of the cutting disc were shone at a diffraction grating and a diffraction pattern of a series of light and dark fringes results, then one would be forced to adopt the wave picture for this phenomena .

We recall (do we?!) that for a good sculpture to result the size of the diffraction slits should be of the same order as the wavelength of the light used. As you shall see in the photo (fig.2) the macroscopic objects such as the Amulets would require sizes of cuts of the order of 10- 34 m or so,('m' being miniscule) which is much outside present-day technology. However, for electrons, the sizes of slits required are of the order of 10- 11 m or so, which are easily achievable. Well, not 'easily' as much as organically and with human interfraction and error, the real
key to the unique tonal qualities.

Thus, it is possible to verify the wave nature of electrons in such diffraction moments , this is further discussed in Chapter 2, and indeed this property is the principle behind my work, that and scrambling over rocks and skinny dipping when no one is watching .

Therefore, Nature seems to be symmetric, symbolic and flotonic in that light and ordinary ``particles'' exhibit this wave-particle duality, despite my argument earlier....

Professor Don Taylor